August 15, 2000
The Honorable Donna E. Shalala
Secretary of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, DC 20201
Dear Secretary Shalala:
In July, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) issued a long-awaited report
requested by Congress and entitled, "Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury."
Among other findings, this report concludes that the most scientifically
defensible reference dose (RfD) for human consumption of methylmercury is
currently 0.1 micrograms per kilogram body weight per day (ug/kg/day). This
is the same reference dose proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) in 1998, the year it released its Mercury Study Report to Congress.
In fact, the report indicates that an even lower level would be scientifically
supportable.
We are writing to alert you that two of your agencies, the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry
(ATSDR), are now using outdated standards for human methylmercury exposure
and should move quickly to consider adoption of the more stringent EPA
standard. The FDA "action level," or the level at which the FDA may take legal
action to remove a product from the market, is now set at 1.0 part per million
methylmercury in fish tissue. When converted to units relevant to human
consumption, this value is about 0.5 ug/kg/day for methylmercury, or five
times less stringent than the NAS-supported EPA level. The ATSDR minimal
risk level (or MRL) of 0.3 ug/kg/day is three times less stringent than
the NAS-supported EPA level. In addition, the NAS report found that selection
of studies and choice of uncertainty factors by ATSDR were scientifically
flawed.
The NAS report is the capstone of an already large body of evidence
highlighting the need for FDA and ATSDR to update their methylmercury exposure
standards and for FDA to resume its suspended tests for methylmercury
contamination in domestically caught fish. We are disappointed that FDA, in
particular, has not considered these tasks a high public health priority. The
FDA has not tested domestically caught fish for methylmercury contamination
since 1998, even after 1997 tests showed that three of the four fish
in one sample exceeded FDA action levels. This raises serious questions about
FDA's commitment to ensuring seafood safety.
Methylmercury is a dangerous neurotoxin that accumulates in human blood, brain
tissue, and organs primarily through the consumption of mercury-contaminated
fish. Given the susceptibility of undeveloped neurological systems to
methylmercury poisoning, the most at-risk populations in the United States
include women of child-bearing age, pregnant women, and small children.
According to the NAS study, five percent of U.S. populations that have been
studied for methylmercury exposure eat enough fish to exceed the 0.1 ug/kg/day
EPA level - this translates into an average of 7% of women and over 60,000
infants at risk each year. In one New Jersey study cited, 21% of women of
child-bearing age would exceed the EPA reference dose.
It is imperative that, as a nation, we drastically reduce mercury emissions to
the atmosphere from coal-fired power plants, municipal trash incinerators, and
other industries that emit over 50 tons of mercury each year - mercury that
finds its way into our nation's lakes and streams and, ultimately, fish. We
have been working on legislation to do this in the Senate for over a decade
and continue to do so. In the meantime, federal health agencies must protect
our citizens at the most stringent, and scientifically justified, levels.
For methylmercury exposure, the National Academy of Sciences report suggests
this is a level of 0.1 ug/kg/day or less.
We hope that you will review this situation and request that (1) both the FDA
and ATSDR adopt a scientifically supported reference dose for human
methylmercury exposure that is consistent with the NAS findings and that
adequately protects sensitive populations, and (2) FDA resume domestically
caught fish monitoring immediately, using statistically valid sampling methods.
With the publication of this report from the nation's premier scientific
advisory panel, there is no longer any justification for interagency
discrepancies in the protection of public health from mercury pollution, nor
in inaction on the monitoring of fish eaten by our citizens.
We look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible concerning your
efforts to address these issues.
Sincerely,
PATRICK LEAHY
United States Senator
Cosigned by Senator Tom Harkin