|
U.S. SENATOR PATRICK
LEAHY
|
CONTACT: Office of Senator
Leahy, 202-224-4242 |
VERMONT |
Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy
On The Nomination Of Virginia Emerson Hopkins
To The Northern District Of Alabama
June 15, 2004
Today we vote on the nomination of Virginia Hopkins
to the Northern District of Alabama. Ms. Hopkins has been an attorney at
the firm Campbell & Hopkins in Alabama, and has the support of both of her
home-state Senators. In particular, Senator Shelby deserves praise for
diligently pressing forward and this confirmation rewards his constant
attention to this nomination. Senator Shelby has always been a pleasure
with whom to work, whether I was serving as Chairman or Ranking Member.
Senator Shelby has always been someone who plays it straight and shows
good judgment. He is fair and forthright.
I must note that since May 18th, the date
of the agreement on judicial confirmations this year involving Senator
Daschle, Senator Frist and the White House, the Senate has confirmed seven
judges, including two circuit court nominees. We confirmed Marcia Cooke to
the district court in Florida, Judge Van Antwerpen to the Third Circuit in
Pennsylvania, and Ray Gruender to the Eighth Circuit the first week of that
agreement. The following week, the Senate confirmed the nominations of
Dennis Saylor, Sandra Townes, Ken Karas, and Judith Herrera to the federal
district courts.
Last week, the Republican leadership did not schedule
any judicial nominations for a vote and considered other business during
that shortened work week. In the month since the agreement to have a floor
vote on 25 judicial nominees, the Republicans have asked for votes on only
seven judicial nominees and have scheduled debate on a variety matters
other than judicial nominees. That is their choice. The Republican
leadership knows that some of the remaining nominees in the agreement for
votes this year require significant time for debate.
I do not want to see the Democrats blamed for any
delay in confirmation votes when Republicans have been advised for weeks
now that it is going to take time for the Senate to process all of the
nominees in the agreement. Members of the Senate deserve time to consider
the merits of the nominees for lifetime positions. Democrats have been
working cooperatively on judges but it the Republican leadership has not
worked with us to schedule the debate and votes on the many remaining
judicial nominees that we had hoped could be considered before the June
25. After today’s three votes, 15 judicial nominees remain to be scheduled
for debates and votes. I hope that we can make progress on more nominees
this week and next. At the pace the Republican leadership has chosen to
proceed, there is now a strong likelihood that debate and votes on some of
these judicial nominees will extend past June 25.
On the occasion of the confirmation of this Alabama
nominee, I would note that some in the Senate have falsely alleged that
Democratic Senators have treated Southern nominees unfairly. Some extreme
partisans tried to divide the American people for partisan political gain
with their false accusations against Democratic Senators. The truth is
that Democrats have treated judicial nominees from the South very fairly:
Southern states comprise about 25 percent of the States in the Nation, yet
out of the 181 judicial nominees of President Bush that we have confirmed
as of this vote, 59 nominees, or one-third of the confirmed nominees, have
been to judicial seats in the South. In particular, I would note that six
of President Bush’s judicial nominees have already been confirmed to United
States District Courts in Alabama since he took office: Judge Karon Bowdre
(Northern District), Judge Callie Granade (Southern District), Judge Mark
Everett Fuller (Middle District), Judge L. Scott Coogler (Northern
District), Judge R. David Proctor (Northern District), and Judge William
Steele (Southern District). Judge Steele, as you may recall, was
initially nominated by President Bush to the Eleventh Circuit, but
President Bush pulled down the elevation of this then-U.S. Magistrate Judge
in order to put forward the even more controversial William Pryor, who was
recess appointed earlier this year despite the serious objections of
numerous Senators. Recent news articles about Judge Pryor’s actions on the
bench have only underscored the concerns of many that he lacks the
political independence and fairness to serve as a judge.
Ms. Hopkins received a partial ‘Not Qualified’ rating
from the American Bar Association. Following the White House’s exclusion
of the ABA from reviewing judicial candidates before they have the
President’s stamp of approval, a dismaying number of this President’s
nominees have received ‘Not Qualified’ ratings. Indeed, four of his
nominees were rated ‘Not Qualified’ by a majority of the ABA rating
committee, and 24 -- more than 10 percent -- were rated ‘Not Qualified’ by
some members of the ABA’s standing committee.
The weight that should be accorded an ABA rating was
called into question after the debacle in which Republican partisan Fred
Fielding prepared Miguel Estrada’s ABA rating recommendation. Mr. Fielding
not only served on the White House transition team advising the President
about cabinet appointments, he subsequently co-founded the Committee for
Justice, which attacks anyone opposed to the President’s judicial
nominees. Similarly, the ABA’s rating to Judge Pickering after his
judicial ethics were called into question by national ethics experts
undermined the confidence that some in the Senate had in the evaluations of
the ABA’s rating committee. Also, the ABA’s ratings do not take into
account the President’s effort to put so many ideologues and extremists
into these lifetime positions on the bench.
In Ms. Hopkins’ case, the ABA rating may reflect her
modest trial experience: She has been the sole or chief counsel in only two
of the cases she has tried to verdict. Ms. Hopkins has been active in
Republican fundraising like many of the President’s nominees, but I am
hopeful, given the confidence Senator Shelby has reposed in her, that she
will leave her partisan roots behind upon confirmation. Out of deference to
Senator Shelby, I will vote in favor of her confirmation.
I congratulate Ms. Hopkins on her confirmation.
# # # # #
|