Congress' Scorecard For Seniors
By Sen. Patrick Leahy
The Essex Reporter - October 4, 2000
Today’s seniors are living longer and better lives than ever
before. But after a lifetime of working and raising families, many older
Americans who should be enjoying this time in their lives are worried about how
they will make ends meet or what will happen to them if they get sick.
Quite simply, we can and we should be doing so much more for our
seniors. Providing first-rate health care and making prescription drugs more
affordable are just a few of the things we ought to be doing for our growing
senior population.
The High Cost of Prescription Drugs
According to the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP),
80 percent of retirees take at least one prescription drug every day. There are
39 million seniors enrolled in Medicare who must pay out of pocket for their
prescriptions. Those without prescription drug coverage, pay, on average, 83
percent more for their medicine than who have drug coverage.
Far too many seniors simply cannot afford the medicine they need
to thrive or even to survive. I have heard stories of Vermont seniors cutting
pills in half or not taking the drugs at all because the cost is just too high.
Many seniors must make the choice between putting food on the table and
purchasing medicine. No one in this country should have to forgo the life-saving
drugs they need. We are not doing enough to help seniors shoulder this burden.
It is time to pass a prescription drug benefit for Medicare.
I am a cosponsor of the Medicare Expansion for Needed Drugs
(MEND) Act. This bill would create a universal but voluntary prescription drug
benefit in the Medicare program. The benefit is designed to assist the three out
of five Medicare beneficiaries who lack dependable, affordable prescription drug
coverage and give them direct access to more affordable drugs and help with
paying for these necessary medications. Beneficiaries who choose the voluntary
prescription drug coverage would pay a premium that will cover half the cost of
the program. In return, the new benefit would cover 50 percent of discounted
drug costs up to $5,000 when fully phased in. The new benefit would also include
coverage for catastrophic drug costs. Under the MEND act, a prescription drug
benefit would be available to Medicare beneficiaries beginning Jan.1, 2002.
Unfortunately, the current leadership on Capitol Hill has not
made a prescription drug benefit for seniors a priority. To improve the
availability of affordable medications, I have cosponsored the
"Prescription Drug Fairness for Seniors Act." In the absence of a
comprehensive prescription drug benefit, this bill will protect seniors from
price discrimination and make prescription drugs available to Medicare
beneficiaries at substantially reduced prices. It will allow Medicare
beneficiaries to purchase prescription drugs at the low prices available to the
federal government and other favored customers, such as large HMOs. Estimates
show that this legislation could reduce the cost of prescription drug prices for
seniors by more than 40 percent.
I have also worked hard to expand the availability of generic
drugs to all consumers – one of the most direct ways to bring drug prices
down. I am pleased to report that this year, once again, the efforts I have led
to prevent several unwarranted drug patent extensions have been successful. If
these drug patents were extended, consumers would pay billions more for widely
used drugs like Claritin.
Social Security Earnings Test
Because people are living longer and healthier lives today, they
are more likely to want to keep working past the age of 65. Until recently,
these seniors who were not ready to retire often could not collect the full
Social Security benefits to which they were entitled each year because their
income exceeded an earnings limit, which was set during the Depression era. I am
pleased that the U.S. Senate unanimously approved a bill in March to repeal this
income limit, which has outlived its usefulness, for seniors who collect Social
Security. This sensible action keeps experienced and productive workers in the
labor force and improves the lives of seniors in Vermont and across the nation.
The president signed this legislation into law in April and it is retroactive to
Jan.1, 2000.
Medicare Reimbursement Rates
The Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 made some important
changes in Medicare payment policy but reduced the reimbursement to health care
providers more significantly than expected. Since the BBA was enacted I have
heard from hundreds of Vermonters – patients worried about their access to
care as well as providers concerned about their continued ability to offer
essential, quality services to the Medicare beneficiaries they serve. Last year,
the Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 added back $16 billion over five
years in payments to various Medicare providers, but it has become clear to
Congress that serious shortfall problems remain for the health care communities
in most states from the BBA of 1997. I have heard from Vermont hospitals, home
health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, community health centers and many
physicians about the need for further BBA relief. That is why I am pleased to be
an original cosponsor of the Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 2000.
This bill is a package of Medicare payment adjustments amounting
to about $80 billion over 10 years, as well as access-to-care provisions for
Medicare, Medicaid, and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. I am
hopeful that Congress will pass this important relief package before the end of
this session. All Vermonters deserve access to quality health care services, and
I will continue to do all that I can to support the continued viability of
Vermont’s health care providers.
The Senior Safety Act
As a former prosecutor, I know that many criminals prey on
seniors and I know that our laws do not do enough to protect seniors. This is
why I have introduced the Seniors Safety Act, to establish new protections and
raise penalties for a wide variety of crimes against seniors – from
telemarketing fraud to nursing home abuse. This bill is a comprehensive package
of proposals designed to offer seniors increased security. We must give law
enforcement officers the tools and support they need to prosecute those who take
advantage of seniors.
Pension Protection
In recent years at least 325 companies, with over a million
employees altogether, have adopted cash balance plans. This phenomena is the
biggest development in the pension world in years. But there is a dark side to
this corporate trend: the fact that many experienced workers face deep cuts in
their promised pensions when their company switches from a traditional pension
plan, which grows as a worker nears retirement to a cash balance plan, which
accrues at a steady rate. It was IBM employees in Essex Junction who first made
us aware of this situation. This issue touches the lives of thousands of workers
whose hard-earned pension benefits have been pared back by their companies'
decisions to make the switch. One worker told me she would have to work an
additional six years just to receive the same benefits under the new cash
balance plan that she was expecting to receive under the old one. These are
workers who play by the rules and put away money for their retirement, and then
wake up one day and find that the rules have suddenly been changed.
Last year, I introduced a bill with Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin to
protect all employees from this "wear away" of their
accrued benefits when their employers convert to cash-balance plans. I will
continue to work to extend wear-away protection to the millions of employees who
depend on their retirement benefits.
We should credit our seniors for their contribution to a legacy
of economic prosperity and freedom. Americans over the age of 85 are the
fastest-growing segment of our population. As this age group grows, we need to
be more vigilant in our efforts to ensure fair treatment. This means controlling
the cost of prescription drugs, providing access to quality health care and
making certain that no one in our country has to make the choice between buying
food or filling a prescription. These are top priorities of mine and they should
be for the entire Congress.