Senate Committee Carves Out $135 Million Targeting Breast Cancer; Minimum Floor Guarantees Research Funds In Defense Spending Bill
WASHINGTON (June 4, 1998)
The Senate Appropriations Committee today approved a $135 million funding
floor for breast cancer research in the FY 1999 defense funding bill.
The committee agreed to $250
million for health care research in the defense budget, and breast cancer
research advocates including Sen. Patrick Leahy, DVt. successfully
added a provision to establish a $135 million floor to guarantee a minimum
level of funds for breast cancer research. Leahy, a longtime leader
in the fight against breast cancer, a disease which claims one woman every
11 minutes, applauded the committee's unanimous approval of the bill.
"With today's vote, we take
another step toward finding a cure," said Leahy, a senior member of the
Senate Appropriations Committee and its Defense Subcommittee, which wrote
the defense budget bill. "We cannot win the war against breast
cancer unless those on the front lines have the resources to do their job.
These research funds within the defense budget now have become a significant
and dependable resource for beating this disease."
Beginning in Fiscal Year
1993, Leahy and other members of Congress and the breast cancer survivor
community launched a crusade to earmark a portion of the defense budget
for breast cancer research, just as the defense budget for years has included
funds to combat prostate cancer, a disease that strikes men. The
bill approved today by the committee also set aside a portion of the $250
million for prostate cancer research. If the $135 million approved
by the committee is enacted into law, the sevenyear total secured for breast
cancer research in the DOD budgets would top $872 million.
Last week Leahy addressed
a breast cancer conference which examined Vermont's high incidence of breast
cancer. According to the latest study by the American Cancer Society,
there are approximately 26.1 cases of breast cancer per 100,000 women in
Vermont a rate slightly lower than the national average but higher
than in most other states.

|