Skip to main content

U.S. SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY

CONTACT: Office of Senator Leahy, 202-224-4242

VERMONT


Hours after today's car-bombing outside the U.S. Embassy in Pakistan, the U.S. Senate Friday approved legislation by Sens. Leahy and Hatch to implement 2 anti-terrorism treaties...one, which arose from the earlier attacks on U.S. embassies in Africa. The Senate vote was 83-1. Below are: 1) news ann't 2) Leahy floor statement 3) section-by-section analysis of Senate-passed bill. --

Senate OKs Leahy-Hatch Bill Targeting Terrorist Bombings
. . . today's embassy bombing cited as need for urgent action

WASHINGTON (Fri., June 14) -- In the wake of today's fatal car bombing outside the U.S. Embassy in Pakistan, the Senate Friday moved to bring the U.S. into compliance with two major anti-terrorism treaties signed after the earlier embassy bombings in Africa.

"Today's events should jolt Congress and the Administration to action," said Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the Judiciary Committee and the bill's leading sponsor. "This bill will help fight the war on terror here at home and abroad. This latest attack tells us we need to act today -- not tomorrow, not next month, but now."

The bill, approved by a vote of 83-1, would bring the United States into immediate compliance with two important international conventions, which were signed by the United States during the Clinton Administration. The International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings ("Bombing Convention") and the International Convention for the Suppression of Financing Terrorism ("Financing Convention") were transmitted to the Senate by President Clinton for ratification, but no action was taken on these treaties until the Senate reorganized under a Democratic majority last summer and the Foreign Relations Committee moved quickly to report these conventions to the full Senate.

Both treaties require the signatory nations to enact certain, precisely worded criminal provisions in their laws - such as the Leahy-Hatch bill-- in order to be in compliance. Both conventions also require that signatory nations exercise limited extraterritorial jurisdiction and extradite or prosecute those who commit such crimes when found inside their borders. It will aid in efforts to extradite terrorists to the United States for trial in U.S. courts.

After a series of anonymous Republican holds on the treaty legislation, Leahy worked with the White House on a consensus bill that will help the United States maintain its leadership role in the international anti-terrorism effort. The House recently passed similar but not identical legislation.

The bill is Leahy's second piece of major anti-terrorism legislation since he became chairman of the Judiciary Committee last summer. Leahy led Senate negotiations with the White House and the Justice Department in writing the anti-terrorism bill (the USA PATRIOT Act, enacted last October), which gave law enforcement agencies new tools in fighting terrorism.

# # # # #

STATEMENT ON SENATE CONSIDERATION OF
THE TERRORIST BOMBING CONVENTION AND THE SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM CONVENTION
IMPLEMENTATION ACTS OF 2001

This morning the Senate is considering the Leahy-Hatch substitute to the "Terrorist Bombing Convention and Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism Convention Implementation Acts of 2001." This bill will bring the United States into immediate compliance with two important international conventions, which were signed by the United States and transmitted to the United States Senate for ratification by President Clinton. Both Conventions were entered into after the terrorist bombings at the United States embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

If anyone needed a reminder why implementing these treaties is important, today's horrific car bombing outside the United States Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, is it. We grieve for the victims; we mourn with the families of the dead; and we pray for the speedy recovery of the injured. And, Mr. President, we must act. The United States must lead the international community in the fight to end such terrorist bombings. That is precisely what my bill the Leahy-Hatch substitute does. I have been working to pass this implementing legislation for more than 6 months. It is time to pass this bill.

We sought to clear implementing legislation through the Senate last December. Since then I have been involved with the White House in an effort to reach consensus on the precise provisions of this matter. We did so and again tried to clear this measure earlier this week. It was cleared for action yesterday.

I thank Senator Hatch for cosponsoring the substitute that I worked out with the White House. I urge all Senators to support the Leahy-Hatch substitute and to pass H.R. 3275 And S.1770. I ask that my full statement be made part of the record.

 

ANTI-TERRORISM CONVENTIONS IMPLEMENTATION

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF
LEAHY-HATCH SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT TO S. 1770

Passed Senate Fri., June 14, 2002, In Vote Of 83 - 1

TITLE I Suppression of Terrorist Bombings

Title I of this bill implements the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings, which was signed by the United States on January 12, 1998, and was transmitted to the Senate for its advice and consent to ratification on September 8, 1999. Twenty-eight States are currently party to the Convention, which entered into force internationally on May 23, 2001. The Convention requires State Parties to combat terrorism by criminalizing certain attacks on public places committed with explosives or other lethal devices, including biological, chemical and radiological devices. The Convention also requires that State Parties criminalize aiding and abetting, conspiring and attempting to undertake such terrorist attacks.

Section 101. Short Title

Section 101 provides that title I may be cited as "The Terrorist Bombings Convention Implementation Act of 2001."

Section 102. Bombing Statute

Section 102 adds a new section to the Federal criminal code, to be codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2332f and entitled "Bombings of places of public use, government facilities, public transportation systems and infrastructure facilities," which makes terrorist acts covered by the Convention a crime. New section 2332f supplements and does not supplant existing Federal and State laws, and contains five subsections, which are described below.

Subsection (a) makes it a crime to unlawfully place or detonate an explosive in certain public places and facilities with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury, or with the intent to cause extensive destruction, where such destruction results in, or is likely to result in, major economic loss. Conspiracies and attempts to commit such crimes are also criminalized. This provision implements Article 2, paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the Convention.

Inclusion of the term "unlawfully" in subsection (a), which is mirrored in Article 2 of the Convention defining the offenses, is intended to allow what would be considered under U.S. law as common law defenses. For purposes of subsection (a), whether a person acts "unlawfully" will depend on whether he is acting within the scope of authority recognized under and consistent with existing U.S. law, which reflects international law principles, such as self defense or lawful use of force by police authorities. This language is not to be construed as permitting the assertion, as a defense to prosecution under new section 2332f, that a person purportedly acted under authority conveyed by any particular foreign government or official. Such a construction, which would exempt State-sponsored terrorism, would be clearly at odds with the purpose of the Convention and this implementing legislation.

With respect to the mens rea provision of subsection (a), it is sufficient if the intent is to significantly damage the targeted public place or facility. Further, for the purpose of subsection (a), when determining whether the act resulted in, or was likely to result in, major economic loss, the physical damage to the targeted place or facility may be considered, as well as other types of economic loss including, but not limited to, the monetary loss or other adverse effects resulting from the interruption of its activities. The adverse effects on non-targeted entities and individuals, the economy and the government may also be considered in this determination insofar as they are due to the destruction caused by the unlawful act.

Subsection (b) establishes the jurisdictional bases for the covered offenses and includes jurisdiction over perpetrators of offenses abroad who are subsequently found within the United States. This provision implements Article 8(1) of the Convention, which requires all State Parties to either extradite or prosecute perpetrators of offenses covered by the Convention who are found within the jurisdiction of a State Party. While current Federal or State criminal laws encompass all the activity prohibited by the Convention that occurs within the United States, subsection (b)(1) ensures Federal jurisdiction where there is a unique Federal interest, e.g., a foreign government is the victim of the crime or the offense is committed in an attempt to compel the United States to do or abstain from doing any act.

Subsection (c) establishes the penalties for committing the covered crimes. The original Senate bill differed from the Administration proposal, which sought to add a new death penalty provision for this crime, despite the fact that such a provision is not required for compliance under the Convention and may create hurdles in seeking extradition to the United States under this statute. The substitute amendment would allow the government to seek the death penalty when death resulted from a terrorist bombing by reference to the existing penalty section for violating 18 U.S.C. §2332a, Use of a Weapon of Mass Destruction.

Subsection (d) sets forth certain exemptions to jurisdiction as provided by the Convention. Specifically, the subsection exempts from jurisdiction activities of armed forces during an armed conflict and activities undertaken by military forces of a State in the exercise of their official duties.

Subsection (e) contains definitions of twelve terms that are used in the new law. Six of those definitions ("State or government facility," "infrastructure facility," "place of public use," "public transportation system," "other lethal device," and "military forces of a State") are the same definitions used in the Convention. Four additional definitions ("serious bodily injury," "explosive," "national of the United States," and "intergovernmental organization") are definitions that already exist in other U.S. statutes. One of those definitions ("armed conflict") is defined consistent with an international instrument relating to the law of war, and a U.S. Understanding to the Convention that is recommended to be made at the time of U.S. ratification. The final term ("State") has the same meaning as that term has under international law.

Section 103 Effective Date

The purpose of Title I is to implement the Convention, and, therefore, section 103 provides that the new criminal offense created in Section 102 will not become effective until the date that the Convention enters into force in the United States. This will ensure immediate compliance of the United States with its obligations under the Convention.

Title II Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism

Title II implements the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, which was signed by the United States on January 10, 2000, and was transmitted to the Senate for its advice and consent to ratification on October 12, 2000. The Convention is not yet in force internationally, but will enter into force 30 days after the deposit of the 22nd instrument of ratification with the U.N. Secretary-General. Once in force, the Convention requires State Parties to combat terrorism by criminalizing certain financial transactions made in furtherance of various terrorist activities. The Convention also requires that State Parties criminalize conspiracies and attempts to undertake such financing.

Section 201 Short Title

Section 201 provides that title II may be cited as "The Suppression of Financing of Terrorism Convention Implementation Act of 2001."

Section 202 Terrorism Financing Statute

Section 202(a) adds a new section to the Federal criminal code, to be codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2339C and entitled "Prohibitions against the financing of terrorism," which makes financial acts covered by the Convention a crime. New section 2339C supplements and does not supplant existing Federal and State laws, and contains five subsections, which are described below.

Subsection (a) makes it a crime to provide or collect funds with the intention or knowledge that such funds are to be used to carry out certain terrorist acts. Conspiracies and attempts to commit these crimes are also criminalized. This subsection implements Article 2, paragraphs 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the Convention.

Subsection (b) establishes the jurisdictional bases for the covered offenses under section 2339C(a) and includes jurisdiction over perpetrators of offenses abroad who are subsequently found within the United States. This provision implements Article 10 of the Convention, which requires all State Parties to either extradite or prosecute perpetrators of offenses covered by the Convention who are found within the territory of a State Party. The structure of this provision is designed to accommodate the structure of the Convention, which sets forth both mandatory and permissive bases of jurisdiction, and excludes certain offenses that lack an international nexus. Some portions of this provision go beyond the jurisdictional bases required or expressly permitted under the Convention, however, where expanded jurisdiction is provided, it is constitutionally permissible and a unique Federal interest is implicated.

Subsection (c) is added by the substitute and, similar to the House passed version of the bill, establishes a new crime of concealment of support, resources or funds provided or collected to violate either (1) the new crime created by this section or (2) the existing crime under 18 U.S.C. §2339B. The new provision added by the substitute clarifies that the mens rea required under this provision is similar to the current mens rea provision found in 18 U.S.C. §2339A; that is, the defendant knows or intends that the support, funds, or resources were provided in violation of either the new crime created in this title or section 2339B.

Subsection (d) establishes the penalties for committing the covered crimes at imprisonment for not more than 20 years, a fine under title 18, United States Code, or both and not more than10 years, a fine under title 18, United States Code, or both for the concealment offense. These penalties are consistent with the current penalties for money laundering offenses and concealment of assistance to terrorists. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956, 2339A.

Subsection (e) contains 13 definitions of terms that are used in the new law. Two of those definitions ("government facility," and "proceeds") are the same definitions used in the Convention. The definition for "funds" is identical to that contained in the Convention with the exception that coins and currency are expressly mentioned as money. The definitions for "provides" and "collects" reflect the broad scope of the Convention. The definition for "predicate acts" specifies the activity for which the funds were being provided or collected. These are the acts referred to in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 2339C(a)(1). The definition of "treaty" sets forth the nine international conventions dealing with counter-terrorism found in the Annex to the Convention. The term "intergovernmental organization," which is used in the Convention, is specifically defined to make clear that it contains within its ambit existing international organizations. The definitions for "international organization," "serious bodily injury," and "national of the United States" incorporate definitions for those terms that already exist in other U.S. statutes. One of the definitions ("armed conflict") is defined consistent with international instruments relating to the law of war. The final term ("State") has the same meaning as that term has under international law.

Subsection (f) creates a civil penalty of at least $10,000 payable to the United States, against any legal entity in the United States, if any person responsible for the management or control of that legal entity has, in that capacity, committed an offense set forth in subsection (a) of the new section 2339C. This civil penalty may be imposed regardless of whether there is a conviction of such person under subsection (a), and is in addition to any other criminal, civil, or administrative liability or penalty allowable under United States law. Subsection (e) fulfills Article 5 of the Convention.

Section 203 Effective Date

Section 203 provides that those provisions of the Act that may be implemented immediately shall become effective upon enactment. However, two jurisdictional provisions will not become effective until the Financing Convention enters into force for the United States. Those provisions are the new 18 U.S.C. §§ 2339C(b)(1)(D) and (2)(B). In addition, new 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(e)(7)(I), which is a definitional section specifically linked to the Bombing Convention, will not become effective until that Convention enters into effect.

TITLE III Ancillary Measures

Title III, which is not required by the International Conventions but will assist in federal enforcement, adds new 18 U.S.C. §§ 2332f and 2339C as predicates to several existing provisions of law.

Section 301 Ancillary Measures

Sections 2332f and 2339C are made predicates under the wiretap statute (18 U.S.C. § 2516(1)(q)) and under the statute relating to the provision of material support to terrorists (18 U.S.C. § 2339A). Sections 2332f and 2339C are also added to those offenses defined as a "Federal crime of terrorism" under 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)(B), as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act. P.L. No. 107-56. In addition, a provision is added to the civil asset forfeiture statute that makes this tool available in the case of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339C. These provisions are consistent with the treatment of similar Federal crimes already in existence.

 

 

Left banner

Return to Home Page Senator Leahy's Biography For Vermonters Major Issues Press Releases and Statements Senator Leahy's Office Constituent Services Search this site