|
Senators Highlight Growing Support For Permanent Ban On
Unfair Net Taxes
...Message Of "Equality For E-Commerce" Gains Support On, Off
Capitol Hill
WASHINGTON (Monday,
March 31) -- U.S. Senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Conrad Burns
(R-Mont.) today joined Representative Christopher Cox (R-Calif.) to
announce increasing support for their legislation to indefinitely
extend the existing moratorium on new and discriminatory Internet
taxes. The current moratorium on unfair Internet taxes – including
taxes on Internet access, multiple-state taxation of a single item
bought online, and discriminatory taxes that treat Internet purchases
differently than other types of sales – is set to expire in November
of this year. A growing number of businesses and organizations
nationwide are backing the effort to make the ban permanent. Wyden
and Burns, along with Senators Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Dianne
Feinstein (D-Calif.), have introduced the Internet Tax
Non-Discrimination Act (S. 52) to make the ban permanent.
“This moratorium
makes sure e-tailers have an equal shot at success in today’s economy,
and I believe they should be protected once and for all from unfair
taxes that threaten their survival,” said Wyden. “States have never
proven they’ve been injured by their inability to discriminate against
online sellers, and e-commerce has grown exponentially under the
protection of the Cox-Wyden law. It’s time to make this ban
permanent.”
“With the current state of the economy,
it's important we instate and uphold commonsense tax laws that are
fair to businesses,” said Burns. “I know how hard it is to stay above
water right now, and it's unreasonable to burden businesses and
organizations with taxes that drag them under. This moratorium puts
e-businesses on a much more level playing field, and I believe it is
time to make it permanent.”
“Electronic
commerce is beginning to blossom, but it is still in its infancy,”
Leahy said. “Stability is a key to Internet commerce reaching
its full potential, and creating new tax categories for the Internet
is exactly the wrong thing to do. Internet commerce should not be
subject to discriminatory new taxes that do not apply to other
commerce. In fact, without the current moratorium, 30,000 different
jurisdictions around the country could levy discriminatory or multiple
Internet taxes on e-commerce. We need to continue the moratorium to
provide the stability necessary for electronic commerce to flourish.”
“Since its
widespread adoption less than a decade ago, the Internet has had a
profound impact on the way America conducts business, and drove the
astonishing increase in our economy’s productivity during the 1990’s,”
Feinstein said. “This legislation will ensure that Americans
can continue to access the internet tax-free and will not have to pay
any taxes directed specifically at e-commerce. By extending the
Internet Tax Freedom Act permanently we can ensure the continued
growth of e-commerce and the spread of the internet into every
American household.”
In the House, Rep. Cox has been joined by 100 cosponsors to date.
Businesses and organizations supporting the House and Senate bills
include:
·
E-Bay
·
The Direct Marketing Association (DMA)
·
Federated Department Stores, Inc.
·
Software & Information Industry
Association (SIIA)
·
U.S. Internet Industry Association (USIIA)
·
Software Finance and Tax Executives
Council (SOFTEC)
·
Information Technology Association of
America (ITAA)
·
American Electronics Association (AeA)
In 1992, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed a previous
ruling that the nation’s 7,600 tax jurisdictions could not impose
sales tax collection burdens on out-of-state sellers if the seller has
no “nexus,” or physical presence, in the taxing jurisdiction. Since
enactment of
ITFA, which applies
the Supreme Court rulings to Internet sales, online consumers have
been threatened by a growing number of tax schemes proposed for
implementation as soon as the ban expired. Those schemes range from
an arbitrary hodge-podge of state and local sales and use taxes to the
creation of a new “unified” Federal sales tax. Extending the ITFA ban
indefinitely will protect consumers by making sure online sellers are
to be treated equally with other businesses.
S. 52 is being
considered by the Senate Commerce Committee.
# # # # # |