President Signs Hatch-Leahy
Bill Targeting Worst Internet Spammers
. . . New Criminal Penalties Imposed for Predatory and Abusive
Commercial E-Mail
WASHINGTON (Tues., Dec., 16) – The President signed
into law Tuesday pioneering legislation co-authored by Sen. Patrick
Leahy (D-Vt.) that creates the first-ever set of criminal penalties
for the most egregious spammers responsible for clogging America’s
inboxes with unsolicited e-mails.
The legislation is part of the Controlling the Assault of
Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act, or CAN SPAM Act of 2003
(S.877). The Senate passed the bill last month. The House approved
it last week.
Leahy co-authored the Criminal Spam Act – the anti-spam criminal
penalties section of the bill -- with Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah),
chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Leahy is the panel’s
ranking Democratic member. The Hatch-Leahy bill is co-sponsored by
Sens. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Bill
Nelson (D-Fla.).
“This is an important step in the fight against junk commercial
e-mail by targeting one of the sources of the problem -- those
spammers who hijack computer systems or use other fraudulent means
to carry out their misdeeds,” said Leahy, known as ‘the cyber
senator’ for his enthusiasm for and leadership on Internet issues.
“Spam clogs the Internet’s arteries and hampers its usefulness,” he
said. “Spam is much more than a technological nuisance. It
undermines the vast potential of the Internet to foster the free
exchange of information and commerce,” he said. “Now, for the first
time we will have tools that target the principal tricks that
spammers use to evade filtering software and to cover their
tracks.”
Internet Service Providers and employers have been forced to take
many costly steps to shield customers and employees from the
billions of spam messages launched against them each day. But
spammers continue to make inroads into personal and business
computers nationwide. A recent study by Ferris Research estimates
that spam costs U.S. businesses $8.9 billion annually in lost
productivity and in the need to purchase more powerful servers and
additional equipment and software.
Spam is also a tool of choice for those engaging in deceptive trade
practices. The Federal Trade Commission has estimated that 90
percent of the spam involving investment and business opportunities,
and nearly half of the spam advertising health services and products
and travel and leisure, contains false or misleading information.
Leahy’s contribution to the CAN SPAM
Act is one of many ways he has targeted aggressive and predatory
business conduct. Last year, Leahy was the principal author of the
Corporate and Criminal Fraud and Accountability Act provisions of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Leahy’s legislation put into effect an array
of new provisions in response to a disturbing upward trend in
corporate greed and deceit in the investing marketplace.
A former prosecutor, Leahy said, “Where the Internet is concerned,
the government should step in only when absolutely necessary.
Unfortunately, spammers have made this such a time.”
The fallout from spam is broader than just financial consequences.
Junk e-mail and other spam can introduce viruses, worms, and
destructive programs into personal and business computer systems,
including those that support the nation’s critical infrastructure.
The Hatch-Leahy legislation:
§
Makes it a crime to hack into a computer, or to use a
computer system that the owner has made available for other
purposes, as a conduit for bulk commercial e-mail;
§
Prohibits sending bulk commercial e-mail that either
falsifies the source, destination or routing information associated
with the e-mail, or is generated from hijacked Internet address
space or falsely registered e-mail accounts or domain names;
§
Subjects violators to stiff criminal penalties of up
to five years’ imprisonment where the offense is committed in
furtherance of any felony, or where the defendant has previously
been convicted of a similar federal or state offense, and up to
three years’ imprisonment where other aggravating factors exist.
# #
# # #