|
U.S. SENATOR PATRICK
LEAHY
|
CONTACT: Office of Senator
Leahy, 202-224-4242 |
VERMONT |
Reaction Of Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.),
Ranking Member, Senate Judiciary Committee,
To SEC And FTC Investigations Of ChoicePoint
And ChoicePoint’s Change In Product Offerings
Friday, March 4, 2005
The
fact that both the SEC and FTC are looking into ChoicePoint’s practices is
welcome. ChoicePoint was careless in the treatment of people’s sensitive
personal data, and the decision of key executives to sell nearly $17
million of stock near the time of this breach raises grave questions about
the circumstances of those sales. Our upcoming Judiciary Committee
hearing will let some sunshine in on these practices so the American
people can know how their information is being collected, stored, sold and
used, and so that Congress can consider the need for privacy and security
rules to protect the public.
The
ChoicePoint debacle spotlights the fact that highly personal information
about each and every American is threatened today by too few safeguards
against breaches like these that can instantly throw thousands of peoples’
lives into chaos. The government is outsourcing more and more data
analysis and security screening work to private data bureaus like
ChoicePoint, which have grown exponentially in just the last few years.
Problems like these certainly raise questions about the way ChoicePoint and
other data brokers are handling its contracts with the federal government
that involve highly sensitive personal and financial information about
millions of Americans. A growing number of us in Congress intend to push
hard to get answers to those questions.
ChoicePoint has told the public that the company had never had a similar
problem before, but the facts tell a different story. In 2002 ChoicePoint
had sold sensitive personal data to a woman posing as a legitimate real
estate business person, resulting in at least a million dollar loss due to
fraudulent activity. This was the same type of scam, and it appears that
the company did not fully learn from this earlier mistake. ChoicePoint is
not alone; in the past two years, Acxiom has also had two security
breaches.
It is
high time for this industry to get serious about its security and privacy
practices. While ChoicePoint has now indicated that it will be pulling out
of certain markets, the issues raised by this industry’s practices are much
broader than this incident. A single market shift does not satisfy all
concerns, and the upcoming congressional inquiries* will help gauge the
depth of these problems.
# # # #
#
*in the Senate Banking and Senate Judiciary
Committees
|