|
Opening Comments Of Senator Patrick
Leahy
Hearing On The Department Of Homeland Security FY 2007 Budget
Subcommittee On Homeland Security
Committee On Appropriations
February 28, 2006
Mr. Secretary,
many Northern Border States are highly skeptical about the
development and implementation of the border crossing card that is
called PASS Card.
Setting aside
whether having this card is good policy or not, I see an economic
and cultural train wreck on the horizon. Commerce and travel will
slow to a crawl if you do not ask for relief from implementing a
border crossing card.
This card
threatens to create damaging bottlenecks on what is currently the
longest, most efficient and safest border in the world.
Clear signs of
trouble are converging on the horizon and I hope you will pay
attention to the looming problems.
With only 18
months to go before requiring all U.S. citizens to have a PASS card
or passport, here is the technical situation:
·
DHS and the State Department
are promoting two different technological infrastructures for the
card.
·
DHS is promoting an “open” UHF
design that is not secure. It is an architecture designed for
tracking freight pallets! If the open UHF standard is adopted, DHS
may actually reduce safety along the border, which is the exact
opposite of what this program is supposed to accomplish.
·
Not only is an open UHF design
less secure, it is completely different technology than what CBP is
installing now to read information off chips in the new
e-Passports. DHS would need an entirely separate, new and costly
reader system for the border-crossing PASS card.
Because none of
the technical issues have been resolved, the logistical planning for
issuance and reading of the PASS cards is also confusing and
delayed.
And finally,
regardless of how the Administration implements the Western
Hemisphere Travel Initiative, there is another half of this
equation, which DHS seems to be ignoring: Our close allies,
friends, and in my state, our relatives, who live across the border
in Canada.
The Canadian
government is not moving under the same deadline for a similar card
for their citizens. Thus DHS is simply expecting more Canadians to
apply for passports.
While DHS
recognizes the need to have a lower-cost alternative for U.S.
citizens, its disregard for our Canadian friends and neighbors is
stunning, not to mention counterproductive.
If the problems
with the PASS card somehow get worked out, DHS is only considering
half the travel and trade across the border. The reduction in trade
and travel from Canadians would be devastating. This “head in the
sand” mentality is not the treatment our neighbors to our North
deserve.
# # # # # |