Statement Of Sen. Patrick Leahy
At The Senate Agriculture Committee Field Hearing
Montpelier, Vermont
“2007 Farm Bill Opportunities For Vermont And The Northeast”
March 12, 2007
Welcome to the Senate Agriculture Committee’s first
field hearing this year to examine the upcoming 2007 Farm Bill. I would
like to thank our witnesses today for taking time out of their busy
schedules to appear here. Your perspectives on the various Farm Bill
programs that Congress will write in the coming months are important to
us and the full Committee. I would also like to encourage other
interested Vermonters to submit testimony to the Committee. The record
of this hearing will remain open for five business days to allow
sufficient time for written comments.
First, let me welcome Senator Bernie Sanders and
Congressmen Peter Welch to the Senate Agriculture Committee. As the
former Chairman of this Committee, and acting as Chairman today, I have
invited them to join me and ask any questions that they may have during
the course of the hearing. Also, Governor James Douglas was kind enough
to accept my invitation to present testimony on the good work the State
is undertaking to assist our farmers and rural communities. Welcome,
Governor Douglas.
Vermont’s agriculture sector is vital to our
State’s future. Farming in Vermont is more than a job or an industry.
It is a way of life. Vermont’s landscape is defined by our farms,
fields and forests, which also define much of our economy. In
particular our agricultural economy depends on the hundreds of millions
of dollars dairy farmers bring to the state every year. We all need to
ensure that dairying is not only a part of Vermont’s rich past, but also
a vital part of Vermont’s future.
However, our dairy farms will not be able to
survive unless they can receive a fair price for the milk our farmers
produce. With the current depression in milk prices, ever increasing
fuel costs and near record high feed costs, dairy producers need
assistance in getting a fair price from the marketplace.
I suspect nearly everyone in this room will agree
with me that the Northeast Dairy Compact was the single best tool for
getting a fair price for milk out of the market, not from the
government. Unfortunately we currently face an Administration that
killed the Compact in 2001 and – with their allies in Congress --
continues to block any efforts to revive it.
In 2002, the Vermont Congressional Delegation led
the effort to create the Milk Income Loss Contract (“MILC”) program that
was modeled on the benefits of the Northeast Dairy Compact. The MILC
program has delivered nearly $60 million to Vermont dairy farmers since
2002. While not perfect, it has been an essential safety net for many.
Unlike the many of the large commodity programs run by the federal
government, the MILC program is targeted to small, generally family-run
farms, and it only kicks in when the market price of milk plummets.
MILC expires in the coming months before the new
Farm Bill will take effect, which means we start with a baseline in
which there is very little funding available for dairy programs in the
next Farm Bill. Though a difficult challenge for us, it is imperative
that the program is extended for a short time to ensure that dairy
programs will have an adequate level of funding during the consideration
of the Farm Bill. Much of the testimony we will hear today will help
inform our efforts to build on and improve the MILC program.
However, the Farm Bill holds many opportunities in
addition to dairy policy. Ranging from important conservation programs
like the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), to Rural
Development assistance for our communities, to funding to enhance the
productivity of working forest lands, we will hear testimony on how
these Farm Bill program have worked and how they can be improved.
And while many people think about the Farm Bill in
terms of milk and other commodities, the legislation is one of the
largest anti-hunger initiatives Congress will consider. Far too many
people in our communities lack resources to consistently put food on
their tables for their families and for themselves. In fact, the most
recent survey of food security by the Census Bureau and the U.S.
Department of Agriculture documents that more than 35 million people in
the United States live in households that face a constant struggle
against hunger. Some here may recall the dispute I’ve had with the
Administration recently about their intention to stop using the word
“hunger” and to call it “food security” instead. But I’ll continue to
call hunger by its name. It is absolutely essential – and it is
absolutely right -- that the 2007 Farm Bill address the pressing problem
of hunger amid plenty, by strengthening our nation’s food assistance
programs.
Finally there will be new opportunities in the next
Farm Bill to expand the agriculture economy in Vermont. On energy
production, Vermont is home to many emerging technologies that are
harnessing agriculture waste products to produce energy. And we lead the
nation on a per capita basis on organically certified farms, an issue
that is close to my heart after I authored the law that chartered the
organic standards and labeling program in 1990. We will be looking for
opportunities to expand and support organics, which are the fastest
growing sector of American agriculture. The Farm Bill also presents a
unique opportunity to provide real financial assistance to expand
broadband coverage in Vermont that is so important to our State’s
economic development.
There are many issues to consider, and I look
forward to hearing today’s testimony. We have a strong set of witnesses
that will build comprehensive record for the Vermont and Northeast
priorities for the next Farm Bill.
# # # # #