Statement Of Sen. Patrick Leahy,
Hearing On The Federal Bureau Of Investigation Fiscal Year 2008 Budget,
Subcommittee On Commerce, Justice, Science And Related Agencies
Committee On Appropriations
April 26, 2007


Director Mueller, welcome and thank you for joining us
today to testify before the Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice
and Science regarding the FY 2008 budget request for the Federal Bureau of
Investigation. You and I get to see each other from time-to-time when you
come before the Judiciary Committee for oversight hearings. Today, however,
I am here wearing my appropriator’s cap and I look forward to hearing you
make the case for the budget the President has proposed for the FBI in the
coming year.
I also want to thank the chair of our subcommittee,
Senator Mikulski, for allowing me to open this hearing on her behalf. She
will be joining us shortly, but is on her way back from the formal send-off
of the 1,300 Maryland National Guardsmen who will be deployed to Iraq in the
next few months. Having attended several such events in my own home state
of Vermont, I know how hard this sendoff must be for the Guardsmen, their
families and friends, Senator Mikulski and all those attending. Our hearts
and prayers are with those brave Maryland soldiers – and all of our brave
men and women preparing to leave - and their families during this difficult
time. We hope they will be returning home soon.
During recent years, the FBI has confronted the
daunting challenge of protecting our nation against international terrorism
in the wake of the attacks of September 11, 2001, the subsequent anthrax
attacks and other threats. Director Mueller, you deserve credit for your
efforts to assure the safety of the American people.
In the wake of terrorist attacks, I recognize that the
Justice Department focused much of its attention on the prevention of
terrorism and the promotion of national security. Its top priorities
continue to be the prevention, investigation and prosecution of terrorist
activities against U.S. citizens and interests, which is evident in the
request for more than $417 million in new investments for the FBI, including
counterintelligence activities and justice information systems technology.
Nonetheless, I am concerned that this budget proposal,
if enacted, would divert critical resources and staffing from traditional
law enforcement matters, such as reducing the spike in violent crime, to
support the Bureau’s counterterrorism work. The FY08 budget requests the
realignment of one hundred criminal agents to counterterrorism work. This
would leave traditional criminal law enforcement significantly understaffed
at the Bureau. Realigning these agents may further erode the FBI’s ability
to combat violent crime and has been cited by the Office of Inspector
General (OIG) as one of the top management challenges at the Justice
Department. We must not allow daily responsibilities that keep our citizens
safe to fall aside.
It has been over two years since the FBI announced it
would scrap the three-year $170 million effort to develop a modern case
management system, known as the Virtual Case File, or VCF. I have
repeatedly expressed to you, Director Mueller, my deep frustration over the
millions of dollars wasted on “lessons-learned,” and the fact that more than
three years have passed since the original deadline while these technology
goals are not met.
Since the FBI announced the VCF’s successor, the
Sentinel program, I have seen nothing to boost my confidence in the Bureau’s
ability to manage the status and cost of this project. While the FBI
estimates that Sentinel will ultimately cost the American taxpayers $425
million, a December 2006 OIG audit report questioned the reliability of the
total estimated costs for the program. It was originally expected that the
full Sentinel system would be deployed in 2009. Just recently, however, we
learned a familiar piece of news regarding the FBI’s computer upgrade
project. Apparently there will be delays in the deployment of Phase I of
the Sentinel upgrade, which jeopardizes the schedule for this much-needed
computer system.
This latest setback is one of a string of costly delays
in the FBI’s efforts to upgrade its computers. Sentinel was launched after
the FBI wasted five years and millions of taxpayer dollars on the failed
Trilogy program. By my calculations, at least $253 million has been
invested in Sentinel alone from FY05 to FY07 between reprogramming dollars
and Congressional appropriations. The President’s FY08 Budget proposes no
funding for the project. The first of four program upgrade phases has yet
to be completed, although we expected the entire Sentinel program to be up
and running by 2009.
Director Mueller, this committee has to ask: Is this
déjà vu all over again? You tried Trilogy and scrapped that. You told us
that Virtual Case File would meet your needs and you scrapped that. Now
that delays in Sentinel have been announced it’s not clear at all that the
third time will be the charm. This has been an expensive series of lessons
– costing nearly $423 million for these three programs so far – learned on
the backs of American taxpayers.
We must ensure that the FBI’s technological
capabilities keep pace, and to do so requires not only an emphasis on
providing funds but also effective use and implementation. I hope the
latter is not neglected and I remain seriously concerned about this project.
The pattern of incompetence and lack of accountability
within the Bureau is also on display with its treatment of its own equipment
and weapons. Another recent report by the DOJ OIG found that the FBI cannot
account for 160 laptop computers and an equal number of weapons that
were lost or stolen over a three-and a-half year period. This finding comes
four years after the Inspector General recommended that the FBI take steps
to ensure the security of this equipment. Even more troubling, in many
cases it was found that the FBI could not even determine whether its lost or
stolen computers contained classified or sensitive information, putting
Bureau employees and other individuals at risk of becoming victims of
identity theft and potentially compromising national security information .
I am deeply troubled by the DOJ OIG’s report finding
widespread illegal and improper use of National Security Letters (NSLs) to
obtain Americans’ phone and financial records. As Chairman of the Senate
Judiciary Committee, I convened a hearing on NSL abuse several weeks ago.
Inspector General Fine testified that his office found 22 separate
instances where the FBI improperly abused NSLs in the review of just 77
FBI files. Not a single one of these violations had been reported by the
FBI. On top of that, because the FBI still lacks the information technology
that it needs to function efficiently in the Information Age, OJG found that
the FBI database used to track NSLs malfunctioned, making it impossible to
keep track of these letters. I fear that the violations the Inspector
General uncovered are probably just the tip of the iceberg and that there
could be thousands of additional violations among the tens of thousands of
NSLs that the FBI is now using each year.
The FBI finds itself again at a crossroads.
Acknowledging shortcomings is well and good, but the Bureau – and the
Justice Department as a whole – must also learn from its mistakes if
progress is to be made. The time has come for demonstrable progress by the
Bureau on a learning curve that has gone on and on for far too long. Much
work remains to be done and I have no doubt that the leaders and members of
this Subcommittee will fulfill their obligation to the American people to
carefully examine all of these issues.
Questions:


# # # # #