Leahy Grants Administration
Request For Extension,
Urges White House To Use Time To Gather Information To Turn Over
[Background:
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), in
consultation with Ranking Member Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), issued
subpoenas on June 27 to the Department of Justice, the White House
Office, the Office of the Vice President, and the National Security
Council for documents relating to the authorization and legal
justification for the Administration's warrantless wiretapping
program. The Committee’s subpoenas were tailored to seek
information relating only to the authorization and legal
justification for the program; the Committee has not sought any
intimate operational facts or details relating to the program.
The Judiciary Committee had
earlier authorized the subpoenas by a bipartisan 13-3 vote. The
return date on the subpoenas is Wednesday, July 18.
Late this
afternoon, Chairman Leahy received letters from the
White House Counsel and the
Counsel to the Vice President seeking an extension of time for
the Administration to respond to the Judiciary Committee’s
subpoenas. Chairman Leahy has granted the Administration’s request
and will work with Administration officials in the coming days to
determine a reasonable timetable for compliance with the Committee’s
subpoenas. The Administration’s letters are attached.]
Comment Of Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.,
Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee,
On Bush Administration’s Request For Extension
Of Subpoena Deadline On Warrantless Wiretapping Documents
July 17, 2007
“The Judiciary
Committee is willing to accommodate reasonable requests and to work
with the Administration on its response to these subpoenas. I hope
the White House uses this additional time constructively to finish
gathering the relevant information and then works with us in good
faith on ways to provide it so that we will have the information we
need to conduct effective oversight at long last.
“Congressional
oversight is necessary to determine whether this Administration has
conducted itself appropriately in carrying out and defending the
President’s warrantless surveillance program. The Judiciary
Committee’s inquiry into the legal justification for the
surveillance program is essential to performing its legislative and
constitutional oversight responsibilities.”
# # # # #