Leahy Pushes For Passage Of Bipartisan
Bill; Republicans Block Latest Attempt
WASHINGTON (Friday, July 27) -- Republican objections continue to
stall efforts to pass a bipartisan bill that would strengthen open
government laws, with the latest example occurring late Thursday evening
before the Senate adjourned for the week. An attempt by Democratic
senators to bring the bill up for debate was blocked by Republicans.
This was one of several attempts in recent months by the Democratic
leadership to pass the bill, which is cosponsored by Senators Patrick
Leahy, D-Vt., and John Cornyn, R-Texas. Below is Senator Leahy’s
comment, followed by the unofficial transcript of the Senate floor
proceedings.
Comment Of Senator Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.,
Chairman, Judiciary Committee,
On Efforts To Pass OPEN Government Act
July 27, 2007
“The Republican obstructionism continues in the Senate and the latest
casualty is Americans’ access to their government. I am deeply
disappointed that Republicans continue to block attempts to pass the
Openness Promotes Effectiveness in our National Government Act” (“OPEN
Government Act”).
“For more than two years, I have worked on a bipartisan basis to
enact this important Freedom of Information Act reform legislation, and
I remain committed to work with any Senator of either party who is
seriously committed to restoring openness, accountability and trust in
our government. It is unfortunate that this bipartisan bill, which
promotes sunshine and transparency in our government, is being held up
by some Republicans who refuse to debate this bill in public.
“The OPEN Government Act promotes and enhances public disclosure of
government information under FOIA, by helping Americans to obtain timely
responses to their FOIA requests and improving transparency in the
federal government’s FOIA process. During the Judiciary Committee’s
recent hearing on this bill, we learned that, although FOIA remains an
indispensable tool in shedding light on bad policies and government
abuses, this open government law is being hampered by excessive delays
and lax FOIA compliance. Today, Americans who seek information under
FOIA remain less likely to obtain it than during any other time in
FOIA’s four decades of service. This bill would help to reverse this
trend and to restore the public’s trust in their government.
“This is a good-government bill that Democrats and most Republicans
are working together to enact, and I hope the few Republican opponents
who are standing in the way will stop obstructing and work in a
cooperative way with us toward a resolution.”
# # # # #
(Congressional Record transcript from Senate floor, July 26, 2007)
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the
majority leader, following consultation with the Republican leader, may
at any time proceed to consideration of Calendar No. 127, S. 849, the
Openness Promotes Effectiveness in our National Government Act of 2007;
that the bill be considered under the following limitations: that there
be a time limit of 2 hours of general debate on the bill, with the time
equally divided and controlled between the chair and ranking member of
the Judiciary Committee or their designees; that the only amendment in
order be a Leahy-Cornyn technical amendment, which is at the desk; that
upon the use or yielding back of time, the amendment be agreed to, the
bill as amended be read three times, and the Senate vote on passage of
the bill, with the above occurring without further intervening action or
debate.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, it is my understanding that there
are ongoing discussions with both sides of the aisle as well as the
administration to come up with bipartisan, consensual language on this
issue and that we are unable to clear the agreement at this time.
Therefore, on behalf of several Republican senators, I object.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard.
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I understand Senator
Cochran has expressed the sentiments
of some on his side of the aisle. I would like to say for the record
that we have made this proposal for several months now. I think those
who are trying to move this issue have shown extraordinary patience in
trying to reach an accommodation, and this is no reflection on the
Senator from Mississippi, who was not involved in this debate, that I
know of. It only is a plea to those who are considering the merits of
this legislation to try to do so in a timely fashion.
# # # # #