Statement of Senator Patrick
Leahy
On SA 4270, an amendment to
create a reserve fund to provide for the timely adjudication of
naturalization applications and FBI name checks
Senate Floor
March 13, 2008
The well publicized naturalization backlog that
the Administration has allowed to build up over the last year
threatens not just to deprive hundreds of thousands of people the
right to participate in the upcoming Federal elections, but it has
undermined the legitimate expectations of those who have followed
the law that their government will function as it is intended.
The related issue of a backlog at the FBI in
completing security name checks in connection with naturalization
applications not only contributes to these delays, but undermines
the very purpose of the security check itself. If a security
name check is pending for as long as 3 years, the result is that
either someone who should not be in the United States is languishing
unaccounted for, or that someone who should be approved is caught in
a bureaucratic gridlock. Neither result is acceptable.
Our amendment gives Congress the flexibility to
legislate a solution in relation to the backlogs at both the FBI and
USCIS if the Administration is unable to resolve this situation.
Whether it be more resources or additional authority these agencies
need, it is becoming apparent that Congress may need to intervene.
The Administration’s efforts thus far to address this issue are too
little too late. Many in Congress have been rightly concerned
about this situation in light of the serious security concerns it
presents, and we should not tolerate the vulnerabilities we are left
with. What was a foreseeable situation was not foreseen.
It is disappointing that for all of the Administration’s rhetoric in
support of fair and realistic immigration reform, it has allowed
this to happen. Those individuals who have come lawfully to
the United States and proved their
commitment through hard work, perseverance, and responsibility
deserve better. I urge all Senators to join us in support of this
amendment.
####