Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy
In
Support Of The Financial Bailout Package
October
1, 2008
This financial
crisis is rooted in material actions involving executive greed and
ineptitude, flawed economic policies, and the incompetence of
on-the-scene regulatory agencies. And we are dealing with this
crisis at the unfortunate intersection of two toxic trends: the loss
of confidence in our financial system, and the public’s loss of
confidence in the Bush Administration. Many have come to agree
with those of us who have long felt that ‘trust me’ is not enough
when this White House asks for sweeping new powers.
As this crisis spreads, threatening to harm our
families, businesses and communities, the clock has been running out
on the federal government’s opportunity to try to staunch the
damage. I opposed the original Bush plan, which was fatally
flawed on several counts. Since then I have worked in good
faith to fix its shortcomings, and by now several constructive
changes have been made. After many fits and starts and long
negotiations that have run through many nights, the clock is close
to running out. As the Senate has prepared to vote on this
revised plan, I have weighed its flaws and its improvements against
the need for action to avert a wider credit crisis and the harm that
would bring to Vermont and the nation.
I had long talks on the day of the vote with
Chairman Dodd and Senator Obama and others to understand their
reasons for supporting this plan. I have come to agree with
them that, while it is far from perfect, it is better than the
alternatives at this crucial point. The spreading national
emergency tips the balance in favor of this revised plan.
Vermonters are divided on this, and I know that
many will disagree with my decision. I respect their views and
appreciate the many suggestions they have made to improve this plan
or to try other approaches. Many improvements have been made.
With credit conditions for businesses, public institutions, states,
localities, and average Americans deteriorating every day, I believe
that acting now to help put our economy on an even keel has become
even more of an urgent priority.
The bill that the Senate voted on tonight has
changed significantly since President Bush first proposed a $700
billion blank check last week. It provides greater checks and
balances on the government’s authority. Any actions taken by
the Treasury Secretary should be approved by an oversight board,
supervised by an Inspector General, reviewed under the
Administrative Procedures Act, and examined by the courts if there
is a question of fraud or abuse. I fought and won in adding
the check-and-balance of judicial review.
This revised plan increases the government’s
insurance of consumers' and businesses bank deposits from $100,000
to $250,000. This would safeguard the savings deposits of
families and businesses and farmers in Vermont and protect the
checking accounts of businesses that continually need to buy
materials, sell their products and make their payrolls.
This plan now also tightens the restrictions on
executive pay and banning golden parachutes for firms participating
in the program. Under current law, there are no restrictions
on the amount of executive compensation that Wall Street CEOs can be
paid. With these people having their hand out for a federal
bailout, we should limit executive pay and prohibit greedy
executives from walking away from the mess they created with
millions while regular American investors lose their savings and
retirement funds.
My decision to support this remedy did not come
lightly or easily. The worsening crisis has made the choice
increasingly clear -- and the stakes of doing nothing, significantly
higher.
# # # # #