Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy
On
The Cluster Munitions Civilian Protection Act
Senate Floor
February 11, 2009
MR. LEAHY.
I am pleased to join with my friend from
California, Senator Feinstein, in introducing
the Cluster Munitions Civilian Protection Act of 2009.
This is a slightly revised version of a bill of the same name
which we introduced in 2007.
Since December 3,
2008, when the Convention on Cluster Munitions opened for signature in
Dublin, 96 countries have signed the treaty including
Great Britain, Germany, Canada,
Norway, Australia and other allies of the United States.
The treaty is the
culmination of a year of negotiations, launched by Norway, among 107
governments that came together to prohibit the use of cluster munitions
that cause unacceptable harm to civilians.
The Bush
Administration did not participate in the negotiations, which I believe
was a mistake. As the nation
with the world’s most powerful military we should not be on the
sidelines while others are trying to protect the lives and limbs of
civilians who comprise the vast majority of war casualties today.
The Pentagon
continues to insist that cluster munitions have military utility, and
that the U.S.
should retain the ability to use millions of cluster munitions in its
arsenal which have estimated failure rates of 5 to 20 percent.
Of course, any
weapon, whether cluster munitions, landmines, or even poison gas, has
some military utility. But
anyone who has seen the indiscriminate devastation cluster munitions
cause over a wide area understands the unacceptable threat they can pose
to civilians. These are not the
laser guided weapons the Pentagon showed destroying their targets during
the invasion of Baghdad.
And there is the
insidious problem of cluster munitions that fail to explode as designed
and remain as active duds, like landmines, until they are triggered by
whoever comes into contact with them.
Often it is an unsuspecting child, or a farmer.
We saw that recently in Lebanon, and in
Laos
people are still being killed and maimed by U.S. cluster munitions left from the
Vietnam War.
Current law
prohibits U.S.
sales, exports and transfers of cluster munitions that have a failure
rate exceeding 1 percent.
That law also requires any sale, export or transfer agreement to include
a requirement that the cluster munitions will be used only against
military targets and not in areas where civilians are known to be
present.
Last year, the Pentagon announced that it would
meet the failure rate requirement for
U.S.
use of cluster munitions in 2018.
While a step forward, I do not believe we can justify continuing
to use weapons that so often fail, so often kill and injure civilians,
and which many of our allies have renounced.
That is not the kind of leadership the world needs and expects
from the United States.
Senator Feinstein’s
and my bill would apply similar restrictions to the use of cluster
munitions beginning immediately on the date of enactment.
However, the bill does permit the President to waive the 1
percent requirement if he certifies that it is vital to protect the
security of the
United States.
I urge the Pentagon to work with us by supporting this reasonable
step.
I want to express
my appreciation to all nations that have signed the treaty, and urge the
Obama Administration to review its policy on cluster munitions with a
view toward putting the
U.S.
on a path to join the treaty as soon as possible.
In the meantime, our legislation would go a long way toward
putting the United
States on that path.
There are some who
dismissed the Cluster Munitions Convention as a pointless exercise,
since it does not yet have the support of the
United States and other major powers such as Russia, China,
Pakistan, India and Israel.
These are some of the same critics of the Ottawa treaty banning antipersonnel landmines, which the U.S. and the
other countries I named have also refused to sign.
But that treaty has dramatically reduced the number of landmines
produced, used, sold and stockpiled, and the number of mine victims has
fallen sharply. Any
government that contemplates using landmines today does so knowing that
it will be condemned by the international community.
I suspect it is only a matter of time before the same is true for
cluster munitions.
It is important to
note that the U.S.
today has the technological ability to produce cluster munitions that
would not be prohibited by the treaty.
What is lacking is the political will to expend the necessary
resources. There is no other
excuse for continuing to use cluster munitions that cause unacceptable
harm to civilians. I am
committed to working in the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee to help
secure the resources needed to make this new technology available.
I want to commend
Senator Feinstein who has shown real passion and persistence in raising
this issue and seeking every opportunity to protect civilians from these
indiscriminate weapons.
# # # # #